Showing posts with label Doctor Who. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doctor Who. Show all posts

Saturday, 9 August 2014

Scarecrows, Bogeymen and Stranger Danger

When I first thought of writing my take on a ‘bogle’ story, ‘Tears of the Tatty Bogle’, I began to wonder about the scarecrow character (as tatty bogles are often represented) and why they lend themselves so readily to use in scary tales.

Clearly there’s the iconic, grizzly look – the stuffed man with a sack for a head and sewn-up eyes, crucified and left alone in a barren field. But the same figure has been used in an unthreatening way in stories – Worzel Gummidge and the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz being obvious examples.

A scarecrow from Human Nature/Family of Blood episodes of Doctor Who, 2007
It made me think of a frightening lone figure in a field from my childhood, the perfectly spooky-story named, ‘Tracker Joe’.

Not a scarecrow, but a living bogeyman, Tracker Joe was the sinister groundsman who used to tend the golf course I grew up near. Let me give you some context here – I lived on a council estate on Walney Island, Barrow-in-Furness and the golf course was there because of the sandy soil; us scum-bag kids from the estate weren’t really welcome at the clubhouse door.

I remember from a young age (around four or five years-old) hearing the stories of what Tracker Joe would do to you if he caught you on the fairway. The one that stuck in my memory was simple but effective: if he found you trespassing, Joe would lift you onto the trailer he pulled behind his tractor and take you to his dark, tool-filled shed; there, he would put your hand in a vice and extract your fingernails, one-by-one, with dirty pliers. Presumably to deter you from stealing precious golf balls.

I don’t know the origin of the stories about Tracker Joe, but I do know this – it was the children who perpetuated them. I was told the stories by the older kids on the estate, the pre-teens us youngsters would try to hang around with, and the teenagers they would try to hang around with. It was perhaps one of the few times the oldest children engaged with the youngest – when they were trying to scare the crap out of us.




Obviously, looking back now it’s clear why the stories existed. What better way to keep the kids out of somewhere that adults don’t want them to be than to terrify them with stories of the awful consequences of transgression? Don’t stray from the path or you’ll get eaten by the wolf. Don’t go into the potato fields or the Tatty Bogle will get you. The great thing is that if the story is really scary then you only have to tell it once for it to take hold and the audience will do the rest by retelling it, embellishing it every time... just like the Tracker Joe stories and the kids on my estate.

We might not hear these urban tales so much today but we do have our bogeymen. We warn our children about the stranger who lurks near the school gates, ready to invite them into his car. Believe me, as a parent, these stories scare the hell out of me.

But while they clearly serve an important purpose, what truths do they obscure? Is the danger really in the woods or is it more likely to be at the end of the path? Was it Tracker Joe us kids should have been wary of or perhaps a monster waiting at home? According to the NSPCC, children are far more likely to know an abuser than not.


The danger outside the home verses the danger within the home was something I had in mind when I wrote ‘Tears of the Tatty Bogle’. While it might not have been the main theme of the story, it was certainly something that informed every part of the writing. I’ll leave you to decide who the real bogeyman of the tale is.




Saturday, 18 May 2013

Doctor Who – sci-fi with laughter and tears


Well that was a series finale-and-a-half, wasn’t it? ‘The Name of the Doctor’, the last episode of the latest series of Doctor Who, was one of the best I’ve seen for a long time. Maybe since Neil Gaiman’s ‘The Doctor’s Wife’.

The run hasn’t had the best press, garnering criticism for its lackadaisical plots and lack of tension, and while I wouldn’t agree with all the criticism, it has to be acknowledged that Doctor Who seems to have lost something since its triumphant return in 2005. It got me thinking...


As well as enjoying the intricate plot of tonight’s episode, and revelling in the most complex character British TV has ever invented, I was struck while watching ‘The Name of the Doctor’ how much I appreciate being made to laugh and cry when watching sci-fi on TV. (Strax is one of my favourite recent characters, and having him fight a pot-wielding Glaswegian just made him all the more loveable).

And I think this appeal to the emotions is something which can easily get lost in British sci-fi productions, perhaps in British drama productions altogether? Or perhaps in sci-fi altogether.

What I loved about the latest big-screen outing of the Star Trek franchise was the re-kindling of the crucial relationship between Kirk and Spock. As well as being the engine (sorry Scotty) that drives the emotional journey of the plot, Kirk and Spock’s relationship is unashamedly TENDER and also gives rise to the key scene of the movie, a scene that I would challenge any trek-meister (is that less offensive that trekkie?) not to shed a Vulcan-like tear at. I loved it.



Doctor Who has always been able to be funny – the eccentricity of the Doctor and the sheer camp wobbly-set-ness of the show has guaranteed that. But maybe it’s been lacking a little tenderness, a little human connection? That’s probably true, but after seeing tonight’s episode I feel hopeful for the next 50 years of the show. Not because (sorry, spoiler alert if you haven't watched it yet) I saw the Doctor cry tonight, but because I saw real love and self-sacrifice at the heart of the drama, when Clara... okay, I won’t say any more – spoilers etc.

Anyway, after seeing ‘The Name of the Doctor’, I feel pretty optimistic about November 2013, especially as David Tennant and Billie Piper are going to be a part of the 50th celebrations. Unless they reprise their turn on that scooter in ‘The Idiot Lantern’... because that wasn’t funny or tender at all.